Social Justice In Education
"Social Justice in Education" by R. W. Connell
discusses the role of
education in society and the implications that social
justice issues have on
education. Connell begins by establishing that
education and social justice can
be examined separately yet they are
inescapably linked through the social medium
of their implementation.
"Education concerns schools, colleges and
universities, whose business is to
pass knowledge on to the next generation.
Social justice is about income,
employment, pensions or physical assets like
housing."(Connell, 1993) Three
points validating the equal importance of
social justice and the education
system to people of all delineations are: 1.)
in Western society public
schools are key forums of social interaction and
comprise some of the largest
social institutions 2.) educational institutions
are highly economic bodies
and have become "major public assets" (Connell,
1993) 3.) teaching
becomes a vehicle by which society is ultimately determined
and has a great
influence over society’s morality. Connell describes the
meaning of justice
in education as being "a question of fairness in
distribution...
equality."(Connell, 1993) "Justice cannot be achieved by
distributing the
same... standard good to... all social classes."(Connell,
1993) By
stating this, Connell summarizes that in the attempt to achieve
equality,
unequal means must be employed. The implications for teaching
presented by
Connell’s article are immense. The concept of equality in
education and the
equality of access to education are matters that are
determined by the social
constructs of the society in which we live. The notion
of equality in
education means that educators must approach all material and
subject matter
with a premise of unbiased predetermination. Music, math,
science, fine arts,
English, Japanese, history, etc... must all be considered on
a par. Our
current educational system does not treat all subjects as equal in
our public
education system. The stereotypical reading, writing and arithmetic
(primary
subjects) take precedence over the fine arts and like subjects
(secondary
subjects). Social justice criteria as presented in this article,
establish
that economic variables are a means of determination for favouritism
within
the educational institution. Where the primary subjects receive
ensured
funding, the secondary subjects receive funding when deemed viable.
This creates
inequality at the very base of the institution itself. The
result is degradation
to all facets of the educational system. "The moral
quality of education is
inevitably affected by the moral character of
educational institutions. If the
school system is dealing unjustly... The
quality of education for all... is
degraded." (Connell, 1993) I sometimes
wonder why administrators and
educators, the facilitators of education,
cannot realize the reasons behind the
success and failures of our education
system. I have often heard educators and
scholars refer to the greatness of
the Renaissance and Romantic eras in world
history and their frustrations due
to the loss of the benefits of those times.
The secondary subjects during
those times of grandeur were not secondary, but
they were primary and equal
subjects to all others; therefore, the benefits of
equalization of subjects
importance is essential in achieving those past
benefits as well as a highly
developed society. Connell presents an intriguing
argument and concludes with
several ideas. "Individual equality is the
condition, not the goal, of a just
social order."(Connell, 1993) Education
which favours is a "corrupt
education" (Connell, 1993) and "social justice
is... fundamental to what good
education is about." (Connell, 1993) Finally
Connell states that good
means different things to different people and"justice cannot be achieved by
distributing the same... standard good to...
all social classes." (Connell,
1993)
Bibliography
Connell, R. W. "Social Justice in Education".
In Schools and Social
Justice. (Toronto: Our Schools/Our Selves Education
Foundation, 1993) pp. 11-19.